The duties involved in carrying out Requirement 9 activities must be written down, allocated to named roles or people, and understood by those who hold them. The guidance notes that roles may be recorded inside the policies and procedures or in separate documents, offers a responsibility assignment (RACI) matrix as one method, and suggests entities consider having staff acknowledge their assigned duties. Applicability: all entities. Customized approach objective: day-to-day duties for every Requirement 9 activity are allocated, and the people holding them are accountable for keeping these controls operating successfully and continuously.
This control maps to 27 controls across 15 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
PCI DSS 4.0 9.1.2 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of PCI DSS 4.0 your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27001:2022 and 139 of 280 PCI DSS 4.0 controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 415 were rejected on the ISO 27001:2022 pair alone.
The graph holds this control, the 27 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.