Responsibilities for carrying out the activities in Requirement 10 must be written down, allocated, and understood by those who hold them. Applies to all entities. The guidance suggests these may sit inside policies and procedures or in separate documents, for example a RACI matrix, and that staff can be asked to acknowledge their assigned roles. Customized approach objective: day-to-day duties for every Requirement 10 activity are allocated, and staff are held accountable for keeping these controls running successfully and without interruption.
This control maps to 31 controls across 12 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
PCI DSS 4.0 10.1.2 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of PCI DSS 4.0 your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27001:2022 and 139 of 280 PCI DSS 4.0 controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 415 were rejected on the ISO 27001:2022 pair alone.
The graph holds this control, the 31 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.