Honor universal opt-out + targeted advertising + profiling per Oregon OCPA per ORS 646A.574. Universal Opt Out Mechanism Recognition must (a) recognise opt-out signals communicated by platforms + technologies + or mechanisms that clearly indicate consumer intent to opt out (Global Privacy Control / GPC + similar), (b) treat as valid opt-out request per ORS 646A.574(5), (c) align with multi-state UOOM specifications (Colorado + Connecticut + California + similar). Targeted advertising opt-out must apply to advertising based on personal data obtained from consumer activity across non-affiliated websites or applications. Profiling opt-out applies to (a) profiling in furtherance of decisions that produce legal or similarly significant effects on the consumer + (b) such as financial + lending + housing + insurance + education + criminal justice + employment + healthcare + access to essential goods or services. Maintain (a) automated decision-making documentation + (b) human review capability + (c) explanation of significant decisions affecting consumers + (d) opt-out fulfilment within statutory timeframes.
Maintained by Gerard Blokdyk·Verified against the published standard ·Control text last updated
What else in your programme already covers this
This control maps to 19 controls across 16 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
NIST-CSF-PR.PS-06 Secure software development practices are integrated, and their performance is monitored throughout the software development life cycle
PIPA-CPO-DPO-Privacy-Officer-PIA-Personal-Information-Impact-Assessment-Articles-31-33 Korea PIPA CPO + DPO + Privacy Officer + PIA + Personal Information Impact Assessment + Articles 31-33