Treat AI outputs as advisory and not the sole basis for decisions, applying more oversight to higher-risk decisions and keeping human judgement; have an authorised human decision-maker review any AI output used to inform or make decisions affecting a person's rights, interests or access to services; and apply human oversight and strict controls where AI systems can plan, decide or act autonomously.
This control maps to 2 controls across 2 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 2 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.