CSF 2.0 outcome: an incident's magnitude is estimated and validated. Priority High. N1: determining magnitude is often one of the hardest parts of incident response. R1: look for indicators of compromise, evidence of persistence and other signs of the incident on the assets known to be targeted and on other potential targets; skipping this or doing it superficially can underestimate the incident and let it continue on other targets unseen.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.