CSF 2.0 outcome: improvements are identified from the execution of operational processes, procedures and activities. Priority High. N1: those activities include all incident response and recovery efforts. N2: improvements may be to the incident response program itself (plan, policy, processes, procedures) or to other risk management activities, such as TTPs not yet blocked by safeguards or flagged by detection. N3: improvements are often found when writing incident follow-up reports or holding lessons learned meetings as recovery concludes, especially after a major incident, reviewing what happened, what was done and how well, with all involved parties, to identify and prioritize improvements.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.