NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 NIST800-SI-20: SI-20 Tainting

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 7 controls across 6 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

SOC 2 · 2 controls

SOC2-CC7.1 CC7.1 Detecting configuration changes and new vulnerabilities
SOC2-CC7.2 CC7.2 Monitoring system components for anomalies

CMMC 2.0 · 1 control

SI.L2-3.14.7 Identify Unauthorized Use

FedRAMP High · 1 control

SI-4(18) System Monitoring | Analyze Traffic and Covert Exfiltration (SI-4(18))

FedRAMP Moderate · 1 control

SI-4(18) System Monitoring | Analyze Traffic and Covert Exfiltration (SI-4(18))

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 1 control

161R1-SI-20 Tainting

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 have you already done?

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 NIST800-SI-20 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27001:2022 and 163 of 1014 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls already carry evidence.

If you hold ISO 27001:202216.1% covered · 851 gaps If you hold ISO 27002:202210.8% covered · 904 gaps If you hold Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.110.2% covered · 911 gaps If you hold CIS Controls v810.1% covered · 912 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-171 Rev 310.1% covered · 912 gaps If you hold C5 (Germany)9.6% covered · 917 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 342 were rejected on the ISO 27001:2022 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free