NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5
MA - Maintenance

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 NIST800-MA-6: MA-6 Timely Maintenance

Obtain maintenance support and/or spare parts for [Assignment: organization-defined system components] within [Assignment: organization-defined time period] of failure.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 15 controls across 12 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

FedRAMP High · 2 controls

  • MA-6 Timely Maintenance (MA-6)
  • SA-22 Unsupported System Components (SA-22)

FedRAMP Moderate · 2 controls

  • MA-6 Timely Maintenance (MA-6)
  • SA-22 Unsupported System Components (SA-22)
  • NIST-CSF-PR.PS-02 Software is maintained, replaced, and removed commensurate with risk
  • NIST-CSF-PR.PS-03 Hardware is maintained, replaced, and removed commensurate with risk
  • CPS230-P25 Information and Technology Capability and Asset Health

CIS Controls v8 · 1 control

  • CIS-2.2 Ensure Authorized Software is Currently Supported

CMMC 2.0 · 1 control

ISO 22301:2019 · 1 control

  • 8.3.4 Resource requirements

ISO 27001:2022 · 1 control

  • 7.13 Equipment maintenance

ISO 27002:2022 · 1 control

  • 7.13 Equipment maintenance
  • MA-6 MA-6 Timely Maintenance
  • MA-6 MA-6 Timely Maintenance

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in MA - Maintenance

You are reading one control. How much of NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 have you already done?

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 NIST800-MA-6 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27001:2022 and 163 of 1014 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 342 were rejected on the ISO 27001:2022 pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 15 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.