Architect cryptographic agility per NIST SP 1800-38 + ISO/IEC 24759 covering: pluggable cryptographic providers + algorithm abstraction layers + key lifecycle management + protocol negotiation (TLS 1.3 PQC hybrid drafts + IETF LAMPS WG) + KMIP + PKCS#11 + HSM management APIs. Implement hybrid + composite modes per ETSI TR 103 619 + IETF drafts where appropriate: ECDH+ML-KEM + ECDSA+ML-DSA + ECDSA+SLH-DSA. Use NCC Group HAPKIDO + Cloudflare X25519MLKEM768 + AWS LibCrypto Hybrid + Google BoringSSL + OpenSSL 3.5+ + wolfSSL + Apple Quantum Resistant iMessage (PQ3) deployments as references.
This control maps to 8 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 8 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.