NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)
GOVERN - NIST AI RMF 1.0

NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) AIRMF-GV-1.5: Ongoing monitoring and periodic review of the risk management process and its outcomes are planned, organizational roles and responsibilities are clearly defined, including determining the frequency of periodic review

Ongoing monitoring and periodic review of the risk management process and its outcomes are planned, organizational roles and responsibilities are clearly defined, including determining the frequency of periodic review. Monitoring and review are scheduled with a stated frequency and a named owner, and the review actually produces recorded findings rather than a confirmation that nothing changed.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 2 controls across 2 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

EU AI Act · 1 control

  • EUAI-Art.72 Post-market monitoring by providers and post-market monitoring plan for high-risk AI systems

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 · 1 control

  • A.2.4 Review of the AI policy

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in GOVERN - NIST AI RMF 1.0

You are reading one control. How much of NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) have you already done?

NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) AIRMF-GV-1.5 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) your existing evidence covers. Hold EU AI Act and 48 of 72 NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 10 were rejected on the EU AI Act pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 2 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.