Nevada Interception of Communications and Private Conversations (NRS 200.610 to 200.690)
In-person private conversations – Nevada Interception of Communications and Private Conversations (NRS 200.610 to 200.690)

Nevada Interception of Communications and Private Conversations (NRS 200.610 to 200.690) 200.650: 200.650 In-person private conversations: do not listen or record surreptitiously unless one participant authorizes it

A person must not intrude on the privacy of others by surreptitiously listening to, monitoring or recording, or attempting to do so, with any mechanical, electronic or other listening device, a private conversation engaged in by those other persons, or disclose the existence or contents of a conversation so obtained, unless authorized by one of the persons engaged in the conversation. A participant who records is authorized by their own participation. For an employer this covers covert audio monitoring of staff conversations by people who are not in them.

Maintained by Gerard Blokdyk

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

  • 2511(2)(d) 2511(2)(d) One-party consent: be a party or have a party's prior consent, and never for a criminal or tortious purpose

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.