The entrepreneur gives the works council the opportunity to advise on every decision he proposes concerning introducing or changing an important technological facility. The request is made in writing, at a time when the advice can still substantially influence the decision, with an overview of the reasons, the expected consequences for the workforce and the measures proposed in response (25(2) and (3)); the advice follows at least one consultation meeting, the council is informed in writing of the decision and of any reasons for departing from its advice, and implementation of a decision that departs from the advice is suspended for one month (25(5) and (6)); the council may appeal to the Enterprise Chamber of the Amsterdam Court of Appeal (art. 26).
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.