Urgent adopters start the diagnosis as soon as possible and follow the rest of the handbook. Regular adopters keep their security current with the latest guidance (for instance upgrading TLS 1.2 connections to version 1.3), prefer solutions that allow cryptography to be changed, allow for the performance cost of future updates, may begin the risk assessment and diagnosis, and follow standardisation, acting earlier when large infrastructure investment, a change of activity or new clients alter their risk. Cryptography experts apply the migration to their own infrastructure, prepare to implement the standardised algorithms as soon as they are available, and tell clients for each product whether it resists attack by a large quantum computer and, if not, what alternative they offer and by when.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.