Under GDPR art. 9(2)(g) the prohibition does not apply where processing is necessary to meet an obligation of public international law (23(a)); where the Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens, the Netherlands Institute for Human Rights or an ombudsman under art. 9:17 Awb processes the data as necessary for its statutory tasks, with safeguards against disproportionate harm to privacy (23(b)); or where processing is necessary in addition to processing of criminal-offence data for the purposes for which those are processed (23(c)).
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.