Where a consumer's personal data is profiled in furtherance of decisions producing legal or similarly significant effects, the consumer may question the result, be told the reason the profiling led to the decision and, if feasible, what the consumer might have done and might do to secure a different decision, and review the personal data used; if the decision rested on inaccurate data the consumer may have it corrected and the decision re-evaluated on the corrected data.
The graph holds this control, the 0 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.