A person, whether present at or absent from a private conversation, must not wilfully use any device to eavesdrop on it without the consent of all parties, and must not knowingly aid, employ or procure another to do so. The rule is the same for telephone and in-person conversations. Penalty: felony, up to 2 years in state prison, a fine of up to 2,000 dollars, or both. Whether a participant can eavesdrop on their own conversation is unsettled: the Michigan Court of Appeals in Sullivan v. Gray (1982) read 'private discourse of others' in 539a(2) as excluding a participant who records, while later decisions and commentators have questioned or limited that reading. This framework records the split and does not resolve it; the opinions are not held.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.