AI Incident Reporting + Response is critical to learning + accountability + stakeholder protection per Japan AI Guidelines for Business + Hiroshima AI Process Code of Conduct + emerging AI Bill. (1) AI Incident Definition: (a) any event causing or with potential to cause harm to users + non-users + society + environment + economic systems; (b) includes - harmful output + bias incident + privacy breach + security incident + system failure + unintended consequence + capability emergence; (c) severity tiers - minor + moderate + significant + severe + catastrophic. (2) Internal Incident Management: (a) Incident detection - automated + manual + user-reported; (b) Triage + classification + severity; (c) Containment + immediate harm reduction; (d) Investigation + root cause analysis; (e) Remediation + corrective action; (f) Post-Mortem + lessons learned; (g) Improvement + control change; (h) Communications + stakeholder notification. (3) AISI + METI Voluntary Notification: (a) Hiroshima AI Process Code of Conduct commitment to incident reporting; (b) AISI receiving voluntary incident reports; (c) METI coordination + aggregation; (d) Anonymisation for trend analysis; (e) Industry benefit from shared learning; (f) Confidentiality protections. (4) Sector Regulator Notification: (a) PIPC for personal information breach; (b) FSA for financial AI incidents; (c) PMDA for medical AI incidents; (d) MLIT for autonomous vehicle incidents; (e) MEXT for educational AI incidents; (f) sector-specific thresholds + timelines; (g) coordinating notification across sectors. (5) Customer + Affected Stakeholder Notification: (a) Privacy Notice + transparency obligations; (b) APPI breach notification per Article 26; (c) Sector-specific customer notification; (d) Affected non-user notification (where identifiable); (e) Media + public communication for significant incidents; (f) Crisis management + reputation protection. (6) AI Incident Database Considerations: (a) OECD AI Incidents Monitor (AIM) - global database; (b) AIID AI Incident Database (Partnership on AI); (c) Japan AI Incident Database under consideration via AISI; (d) Sector-specific databases (medical + financial); (e) Public + private repositories. (7) Coordinated Vulnerability Disclosure (CVD): (a) AI-specific CVD process; (b) Bug bounty programs including AI safety; (c) Responsible disclosure timeline; (d) JPCERT/CC coordination; (e) JVN Japan Vulnerability Notes; (f) International coordination with AISI Network + FIRST. (8) Hiroshima AI Process Code of Conduct - Incident Reporting Commitment: (a) Commitment 4 - work toward responsible information sharing + incident reporting; (b) sharing of incident patterns + vulnerabilities + misuse; (c) industry-wide learning; (d) regulator coordination; (e) civil society + academic engagement. (9) Post-Mortem + Lessons Learned: (a) blameless post-mortem culture; (b) facts + timeline + impact + root cause + remediation; (c) systemic vs individual causes; (d) sharing with relevant audiences (internal + industry + regulator + public); (e) improvement action tracking; (f) effectiveness review. (10) Industry Information Sharing: (a) Information Sharing and Analysis Centers (ISACs) for AI emerging; (b) Industry consortia - Partnership on AI + Frontier Model Forum + ML Commons; (c) Sector consortia - Financial + Healthcare + Critical Infrastructure; (d) Confidentiality + anti-trust considerations; (e) Standardised incident format (STIX-like for AI); (f) International coordination via AISI Network. (11) Crisis Management for AI Incidents: (a) Incident Command structure; (b) Senior management decision authority; (c) Legal + Compliance + Communications coordination; (d) Customer + media + regulator response; (e) Litigation hold + evidence preservation; (f) Insurance notification; (g) Recovery + restoration; (h) Long-Term remediation. (12) AI Incident Insurance: (a) Emerging AI-specific insurance products; (b) Coverage areas - cybersecurity + privacy breach + product liability + professional liability + D and O; (c) Underwriting requires AI risk assessment; (d) Limits + exclusions specific to AI; (e) Claims process + insurer coordination. Coordinates with OECD AI Incidents Monitor (AIM) + AIID Partnership on AI + JPCERT/CC + JVN Japan Vulnerability Notes + FIRST + APCERT + PIPC + FSA + PMDA + MLIT + MEXT + sector regulators + Hiroshima AI Process Code of Conduct + AISI Japan + AISI Network + Frontier Model Forum + Partnership on AI + ML Commons + ISO/IEC 27035 Information Security Incident Management + ISO/IEC 42001 + NIST AI RMF Manage.5 + insurance industry (Tokio Marine + Sompo + MS&AD + others). Japan AI Guidelines Incident Reporting + Response applies.
The graph holds this control, the 0 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.