For a metric it has developed itself, the entity explains the definition, including whether the metric is an adaptation of one from another source and, where it is, naming that source and how the two differ; whether it is absolute, expressed relative to another metric, or qualitative (a RAG status, for example); whether a third party validates it, and who; and how it is calculated and with what inputs, including the method's limitations and the significant assumptions made.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.