Each requirement set for a system, software or service is: complete (it stands alone and describes the needed capabilities, characteristics, constraints and quality factors without outside information, and holds no unresolved open-item markers (to be defined, to be specified, to be resolved), with a timeframe for settling any that remain set by risk and dependencies); consistent (requirements are unique, do not conflict or overlap, use homogeneous units and measurement systems, and each term keeps one meaning throughout); feasible as a whole, which includes being affordable; comprehensible (what is expected and how it relates to the containing system is clear); and able to be validated (meeting the set will practically achieve the needs within cost, schedule, technical, legal and regulatory limits). Completeness improves when every relevant requirement type, every life cycle stage and every stakeholder group is covered. The set is checked carefully against these properties so that requirements creep does not later drive cost, schedule or quality.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.