The review must cover: status of actions from earlier reviews; changes in relevant external and internal issues; changes in relevant interested party needs and expectations; AIMS performance information including trends in nonconformities and corrective actions, monitoring and measurement results and audit results; and opportunities for continual improvement.
This control maps to 4 controls across 4 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 9.3.2 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of ISO/IEC 42001:2023 your existing evidence covers. Hold NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and 30 of 38 ISO/IEC 42001:2023 controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) pair alone.
The graph holds this control, the 4 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.