Tools (software, hardware and firmware together) are chosen on the agreed requirements and the ISO/IEC 27041 processes that make up the analysis, and users are competent with them in that process context. Processes that bring in new tools must be able to pass validation and confirmation before deployment, which users weigh before adopting them, and tool selection for validated processes follows ISO/IEC 27041. Because validation concerns the intended use, a tool with known flaws can still be used if the process it takes part in is shown fit for that use.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.