Facilities and environmental conditions shall suit the laboratory's activities and shall not harm the validity of results (influences may include contamination, dust, electromagnetic interference, radiation, humidity, temperature, electrical supply, vibration and sound). The requirements for them shall be documented. Environmental conditions shall be monitored, controlled and recorded where specifications, methods or procedures call for it or where they affect whether results are valid. Controls over the facilities shall be put in place, monitored and reviewed from time to time, and shall cover access to and use of the areas that affect laboratory work, preventing contamination, interference or other harmful influences, and keeping incompatible activities apart. Where work is done at sites the laboratory does not permanently control, the same requirements shall be met there.
This control maps to 2 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 2 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.