The organization identifies the interested parties relevant to its OH&S system, what each of them requires, and which of those requirements it will address through the system. In doing so it must take account of how diverse its workforce and those other parties are, both in identifying their needs and in judging which needs are, or could turn into, legal or other requirements. A note keeps the Amendment 1 point that parties may have climate-related requirements.
This control maps to 2 controls across 2 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 2 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.