Using the clause 4 issues, the organization settles which risks and opportunities need action, including psychosocial hazards, preventing injury and ill health, return-to-work strategies, improvement opportunities such as promoting well-being, and building, reviewing and maintaining the systems, processes and reporting lines relevant to psychosocial risk; actions are ranked by the psychosocial risk assessment. Planning is used to set suitable objectives, to decide how they will be met along with legal and other requirements, and to show a commitment to improve that goes past legal minimums where it can. Planning takes account of particular worker groups (lone, remote, minority), particular workplaces, operations or tasks, what the assessment found about the nature and causes of the risks, putting in place measures that remove hazards and reduce risk, evaluating those measures and their results, reviewing and updating the process as needs change while recognizing good practice, the resources required, and involving workers through consultation and participation.
This control maps to 3 controls across 2 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 3 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.