ISO 22301:2019 4.2.1: General

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 20 controls across 11 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

HIPAA Security Rule · 4 controls

164.306 Security Standards: General Rules
164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A) Risk Analysis (Required)
164.308(a)(7)(i) Contingency Plan (Standard)
164.316(a) Policies and Procedures (Standard)

SOC 2 · 4 controls

SOC2-CC1.3 CC1.3 Structures, reporting lines, authorities and responsibilities (COSO principle 3)
SOC2-CC2.2 CC2.2 Internal communication of objectives and control responsibilities (COSO principle 14)
SOC2-CC3.1 CC3.1 Objectives specified clearly enough to assess risk (COSO principle 6)
SOC2-CC3.2 CC3.2 Identifying and analysing risks to objectives (COSO principle 7)

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 3 controls

164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A) Risk Analysis (Required)
164.308(a)(7)(i) Contingency Plan (Standard)
164.316(a) Policies and Procedures (Standard)

ISO 27002:2022 · 2 controls

5.21 Managing information security in the ICT supply chain
5.31 Legal, statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

C5-OIS-03 Interfaces and Dependencies

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) · 1 control

CFTC-SS-29 Recovery Plan Accounts for Essential Service Providers

ISO 28002:2011 · 1 control

A.4.2 A.4.2 Internal and external communication and consultation

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 · 1 control

4.2 Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 1 control

NIST-CSF-GV.OC-02 Internal and external stakeholders are understood, and their needs and expectations regarding cybersecurity risk management are understood and considered

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 1 control

161R1-SR-13 Supplier Inventory

PCI DSS 4.0 · 1 control

12.8.1 12.8.1 List of third-party service providers

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of ISO 22301:2019 have you already done?

ISO 22301:2019 4.2.1 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of ISO 22301:2019 your existing evidence covers. Hold APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and 28 of 57 ISO 22301:2019 controls already carry evidence.

If you hold APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management49.1% covered · 29 gaps If you hold NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.047.4% covered · 30 gaps If you hold C5 (Germany)42.1% covered · 33 gaps If you hold CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)38.6% covered · 35 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-161 Rev 136.8% covered · 36 gaps If you hold SOC 235.1% covered · 37 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free