The information reviewer checks that the information is present and sufficient when measured against the level of information need set in the EIR and any further expectations (entities, relationships, properties, shape and how each is represented; ISO/TS 12911, EN 17412-1). Three purposes are weighed: the current stage or trigger event; overseeing and coordinating the delivery or operational phase, including spatial, physical and process coordination; and long-term management and wider societal needs served by standard naming, classification and open standards. The reviewer also weighs the status code, a formal procedure or checklists built from the requirements (possibly as automated rules, where IDM, MVD and IDS can help), and making the checking procedures known to providers through the production methods and procedures.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.