The information receiver assesses a container against the clause 7 criteria and then either rejects it or authorizes and accepts it for publication (ISO 19650-1 12.5, 19650-2 5.7.2, 19650-3 5.6.6). This can happen in two stages, with the lead appointed party authorizing and the appointing party accepting (19650-2 5.7.4, 19650-3 5.7.2). Reviewers consider how well the quality management processes ensure compliance: the provider's quality control and assurance before sharing, and the reviewers' own quality control after sharing.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.