Auditors should be free of bias or influence that could affect objectivity and should be neither indecisive nor aggressive. They stay within scope, act objectively, gather relevant and sufficient evidence to support conclusions, watch for signs that call for deeper auditing, can explain the relevance of their questions, can address the auditee's doubts about findings, confirm that the auditee's people know about, can reach, understand and actually use the documents and information that set out system requirements, and confirm that the documents describing the safety system are adequate.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.