GHG accounting and reporting must rest on five principles, of which this one: Quantification is, as far as can be judged, neither systematically above nor below actual emissions, uncertainty is reduced where practicable, and accuracy is good enough for users to rely on the information with reasonable assurance.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.