A judgment of a court or tribunal, or a decision of an administrative authority, of a third country requiring a controller or processor to transfer or disclose personal data may be recognised or enforceable only if it is based on an international agreement in force between the requesting third country and the Union or a Member State, such as a mutual legal assistance treaty, without prejudice to the other grounds for transfer in Chapter V. In practice the controller or processor must not treat a foreign order as being by itself a lawful ground to hand over personal data, and must route such demands through the applicable mutual legal assistance route or another Chapter V ground before disclosing.
GDPR GDPR-Art.48 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of GDPR your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27701:2019 and 21 of 40 GDPR controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the ISO 27701:2019 pair alone.
The graph holds this control, the 0 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.