The regulated company seeks continual improvement of its computerized system processes by developing understanding of how the life cycle framework is working in practice and by using metrics. Understanding comes from reviewing the outcomes of projects, periodic reviews, incidents, changes, audits and inspections and from lessons learned; metrics, such as defect escape rates, change volumes, incident trends, review outcomes and cycle times, are defined, collected and used to identify where processes are over- or under-engineered, and the results feed updates to policies, procedures, templates, tools and training.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.