Florida Security of Communications Act (Fla. Stat. Chapter 934)
All-party consent to intercept or record – Florida Security of Communications Act (Fla. Stat. Chapter 934)

Florida Security of Communications Act (Fla. Stat. Chapter 934) 934.03(1)(a) oral: 934.03(1)(a) In-person conversations: record only with the prior consent of all parties where privacy is expected

A person must not intentionally intercept an oral communication, meaning spoken words uttered with a justified expectation that they are not being intercepted, without the prior consent of all parties (934.03(2)(d)). Conversations in circumstances where no such expectation is justified, such as a public meeting, are outside the definition. For an employer this covers audio on CCTV, meeting-room and office recording, body-worn and in-vehicle microphones, and managers recording interviews.

Maintained by Gerard Blokdyk

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

  • 2511(2)(d) 2511(2)(d) One-party consent: be a party or have a party's prior consent, and never for a criminal or tortious purpose

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in All-party consent to intercept or record – Florida Security of Communications Act (Fla. Stat. Chapter 934)

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.