Florida FDBR coordination with the rapidly-growing US state privacy law ecosystem. COMPARABLE STATE LAWS (as of 2026 - approximately 20 comprehensive state privacy laws): California (CCPA + CPRA + 2018/2020) + Virginia VCDPA (2021) + Colorado CPA (2021) + Connecticut CTDPA (2022) + Utah UCPA (2022) + Iowa ICDPA (2023) + Indiana INCDPA (2023) + Tennessee TIPA (2023) + Montana MCDPA (2023) + Oregon OCPA (2023) + Texas TDPSA (2023) + Delaware DPDPA (2023) + New Jersey NJDPA (2024) + New Hampshire NHDPA (2024) + Kentucky KCDPA (2024) + Maryland MDPA (2024) + Minnesota MCDPA (2024) + Nebraska NDPA (2024) + Rhode Island RIDTPPA (2024) + Washington WDPA (2025) + Florida FDBR. KEY DIFFERENTIATORS for FDBR: (a) NARROWEST APPLICABILITY (USD 1B threshold + big-tech-specific) - most other states are USD 25M-100M + business volume + consumer thresholds; (b) UNIQUE VOICE/FACIAL RECOGNITION OPT-OUT not in other state laws; (c) UNIQUE GOVERNMENT CONTENT MODERATION PROHIBITION; (d) UNIQUE SEARCH ENGINE POLITICAL BIAS DISCLOSURE; (e) child threshold UNDER 18 (most states use 13 or 16). CROSS-MAPPING: most state laws share core rights (access + correction + deletion + portability + opt-out) + can be mapped to common control set; FDBR's unique provisions are framework-exclusive. FUTURE COORDINATION: federal preemption proposals (American Privacy Rights Act, APRA) advancing in Congress 2024-2025 + may preempt some state laws; the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board considering federal-state coordination.
The graph holds this control, the 0 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.