FedRAMP Moderate AC-2(2): Automated Temporary and Emergency Account Management

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 16 controls across 10 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 3 controls

SEC02-BP02 Use temporary credentials
SEC03-BP03 Establish emergency access process
SEC10-BP05 Pre-provision access

SOC 2 · 3 controls

SOC2-CC6.2 Prior to granting access, registration and authorization processes are established
SOC2-CC6.3 Role-based access and least privilege are enforced
SOC2-CC7.1 Detection and monitoring procedures for security events are in place

Azure Security Benchmark · 2 controls

ASBv3-PA-5 Set up emergency access
PA-2 Avoid standing access for user accounts and permissions

ISO 27002:2022 · 2 controls

5.16 Identity management
5.18 Access rights

Australia My Health Records Act 2012 · 1 control

MYHR-SEC-6 Emergency access controls

HIPAA Security Rule · 1 control

164.312(a)(2)(ii) Emergency Access Procedure (Required)

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 1 control

03.01.01 Account Management

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 1 control

NIST800-AC-2 Account management

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 1 control

164.312(a)(2)(ii) Emergency Access Procedure (Required)

PCI DSS 4.0 · 1 control

8.2.7 Third-party access managed

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP Moderate have you already done?

FedRAMP Moderate AC-2(2) is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP Moderate your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27002:2022 and 182 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls already carry evidence.

If you hold ISO 27002:202256.3% covered · 141 gaps If you hold PCI DSS 4.051.1% covered · 158 gaps If you hold ISO 27001:202249.8% covered · 162 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-171 Rev 345.5% covered · 176 gaps If you hold C5 (Germany)37.2% covered · 203 gaps If you hold CMMC 2.035% covered · 210 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 348 were rejected on the ISO 27002:2022 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free