FedRAMP High SC-7(7): Split Tunneling for Remote Devices

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 10 controls across 8 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

ISO 27001:2022 · 2 controls

6.7 Remote working
8.20 Networks security

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 2 controls

NIST800-AC-17 Remote access
NIST800-SC-7 Boundary protection

ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) · 1 control

ANSSI-HYG-32 Secure the Network Connection of Devices Used for Mobile Working

CIS Controls v8 · 1 control

CIS-12.7 Ensure Remote Devices Utilize a VPN and are Connecting to an Enterprise’s AAA Infrastructure

CMMC 2.0 · 1 control

SC.L2-3.13.7 Split Tunneling

PCI DSS 4.0 · 1 control

1.5.1 Security controls on dual-connected computing devices

SOC 2 · 1 control

SOC2-CC6.6 Measures against threats outside system boundaries are implemented

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP High have you already done?

FedRAMP High SC-7(7) is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP High your existing evidence covers. Hold C5 (Germany) and 119 of 410 FedRAMP High controls already carry evidence.

If you hold C5 (Germany)29% covered · 291 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 6 were rejected on the C5 (Germany) pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free