FedRAMP High
SC - System and Communications Protection

FedRAMP High SC-22: Architecture and Provisioning for Name/Address Resolution Service

Ensure DNS systems are fault-tolerant and implement role separation.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 16 controls across 8 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

ISO 27001:2022 · 4 controls

  • 5.3 Segregation of duties
  • 8.14 Redundancy of information processing facilities
  • 8.22 Segregation of networks
  • 8.27 Secure system architecture and engineering principles

SOC 2 · 4 controls

  • SOC2-A1.1 A1.1 Managing processing capacity
  • SOC2-A1.2 A1.2 Environmental protection, backup and recovery infrastructure
  • SOC2-CC5.2 CC5.2 General controls over technology (COSO principle 11)
  • SOC2-CC6.1 CC6.1 Logical access security over protected information assets

ISO 27002:2022 · 3 controls

  • 8.14 Redundancy of information processing facilities
  • 8.21 Security of network services
  • 8.22 Segregation of networks
  • NIST800-SC-22 SC-22 Architecture and Provisioning for Name/Address Resolution Service
  • SC-22 SC-22 Architecture and Provisioning for Name/Address Resolution Service
  • SC-22 SC-22 Architecture and Provisioning for Name/Address Resolution Service
  • SC-22 SC-22 Architecture and Provisioning for Name/Address Resolution Service

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in SC - System and Communications Protection

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP High have you already done?

FedRAMP High SC-22 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP High your existing evidence covers. Hold C5 (Germany) and 119 of 410 FedRAMP High controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 6 were rejected on the C5 (Germany) pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 16 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.