FedRAMP High SC-21: Secure Name/Address Resolution Service (Recursive or Caching Resolver)

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 8 controls across 6 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

CIS Controls v8 · 2 controls

CIS-4.9 Configure Trusted DNS Servers on Enterprise Assets
CIS-9.2 Use DNS Filtering Services

ISO 27002:2022 · 2 controls

8.21 Security of network services
8.24 Use of cryptography

Azure Security Benchmark · 1 control

ASBv3-NS-10 Ensure Domain Name System (DNS) security

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 1 control

NIST800-SC-20 Secure name/address resolution service

SOC 2 · 1 control

SOC2-CC6.6 Measures against threats outside system boundaries are implemented

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP High have you already done?

FedRAMP High SC-21 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP High your existing evidence covers. Hold C5 (Germany) and 119 of 410 FedRAMP High controls already carry evidence.

If you hold C5 (Germany)29% covered · 291 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 6 were rejected on the C5 (Germany) pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 8 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.

MCP endpoint All FedRAMP High controls