FedRAMP High
PS - Personnel Security

FedRAMP High PS-8: Personnel Sanctions

Employ formal sanctions for personnel failing to comply with security/privacy policies; notify defined personnel within FedRAMP timeframe.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 17 controls across 12 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

SOC 2 · 3 controls

  • SOC2-CC1.1 COSO principle 1: Demonstrates commitment to integrity and ethical values
  • SOC2-CC1.5 COSO principle 5: Holds individuals accountable for internal control responsibilities
  • SOC2-CC7.4 Responds to identified security incidents through defined procedures

ISO 27001:2022 · 2 controls

  • 5.4 Management responsibilities
  • 6.4 Disciplinary process

ISO 27002:2022 · 2 controls

  • 5.4 Management responsibilities
  • 6.4 Disciplinary process

APPI · 1 control

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

HIPAA Security Rule · 1 control

ISO 27701:2019 · 1 control

  • NIST-CSF-GV.PO-02 Policy for managing cybersecurity risks is reviewed, updated, communicated, and enforced to reflect changes in requirements, threats, technology, and organizational mission

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in PS - Personnel Security

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP High have you already done?

FedRAMP High PS-8 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP High your existing evidence covers. Hold C5 (Germany) and 119 of 410 FedRAMP High controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 6 were rejected on the C5 (Germany) pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 17 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.