FedRAMP High
MA - Maintenance

FedRAMP High MA-1: Policy and Procedures

Develop, document, disseminate and review the policy for maintenance, and its procedures, on the FedRAMP-defined cadence: policy at least annually under High and at least every three years under Moderate, procedures at least annually and after significant changes under both.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 13 controls across 11 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

ISO 27002:2022 · 2 controls

  • 5.1 Policies for information security
  • 7.13 Equipment maintenance

PCI DSS 4.0 · 2 controls

  • 12.1.1 12.1.1 Overall information security policy established and disseminated
  • 12.1.2 12.1.2 Security policy reviewed annually and updated as needed

ISO 27001:2022 · 1 control

  • 5.1 Policies for information security
  • NIST-CSF-GV.PO-02 Policy for managing cybersecurity risks is reviewed, updated, communicated, and enforced to reflect changes in requirements, threats, technology, and organizational mission
  • MA-1 MA-1 Policy and Procedures
  • MA-1 MA-1 Policy and Procedures
  • MA-1 MA-1 Policy and Procedures

SOC 2 · 1 control

  • SOC2-CC5.3 CC5.3 Deploying controls through policies and procedures (COSO principle 12)

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in MA - Maintenance

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP High have you already done?

FedRAMP High MA-1 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP High your existing evidence covers. Hold C5 (Germany) and 119 of 410 FedRAMP High controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 6 were rejected on the C5 (Germany) pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 13 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.