Article 14 sets the three exception categories. Article 14(1)(a) accessibility requirements do not apply where compliance would require A SIGNIFICANT CHANGE in a product or service that results in the FUNDAMENTAL ALTERATION of its basic nature. Article 14(1)(b) accessibility requirements do not apply where compliance would result in the imposition of a DISPROPORTIONATE BURDEN on the economic operators concerned. Article 14(2) economic operators must perform an Annex VI ASSESSMENT of whether Article 14(1) exceptions apply, considering: relationship of net costs of compliance to the costs (total expenditure - direct + indirect costs - capital + operational) + estimated costs + benefits relative to estimated benefits for persons with disabilities; benefits for accessibility considering the frequency + duration of use. Article 14(3) the Article 14(1)(b) disproportionate-burden invocation must NOT be based on: lack of priority; time; knowledge (the same Article 5(4) WAD inadmissible grounds rule). Article 14(4) the disproportionate-burden assessment must be reviewed at least every 5 years or when the service is modified or upon request of market-surveillance authorities. Article 14(5) economic operators receiving public funds for accessibility may NOT invoke Article 14(1)(b). Article 14(6) MICROENTERPRISES that provide services are exempt from full Article 4(1) requirements but must notify the competent authority + on request provide an Annex VI-equivalent assessment.
The graph holds this control, the 0 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.