Paragraph 1 lists the findings that count as formal non-compliance: CE marking affixed in breach of the regulation or Article 18; CE marking not affixed; no EU declaration; an incorrect declaration; technical documentation unavailable or incomplete; the identification information in Article 7(6) or Article 9(4) absent, false or incomplete; or any other administrative requirement in Article 7 or 9 not met. Where a member state makes such a finding, it requires the operator to end the non-compliance. Paragraph 2 applies if the failure persists: the member state takes appropriate measures to restrict or prohibit making the product available, or to ensure it is withdrawn. The article is a reminder that an accessible product can still fail on the file. Authorities do not have to prove a usability defect to act on a missing declaration or an incomplete technical file.
The graph holds this control, the 0 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.