Article 6 establishes the PRESUMPTION OF CONFORMITY regime. Article 6(1) the content of websites + mobile applications that meets the harmonised standards (or parts thereof) the references of which have been published by the European Commission in the OJEU in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 shall be presumed to comply with the accessibility requirements set out in Article 4 + that are covered by such standards or parts thereof. THE CURRENT HARMONISED STANDARD IS EN 301 549 (currently v3.2.1, with v4.x in development). Article 6(2) where no harmonised standards exist for specific accessibility requirements the Commission may adopt implementing acts setting out technical specifications meeting those requirements + ensuring presumption of conformity. Article 6(3) where no harmonised standards or technical specifications exist for specific accessibility requirements the content of websites + mobile applications complying with the requirements of EU national or international standards or technical specifications providing for at least the equivalent level of accessibility shall be presumed to comply with the accessibility requirements set out in Article 4 + covered by those standards.
This control maps to 6 controls across 2 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 6 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.