Article 22 implements the public's right to request + obtain from the competent authority the information referred to in Article 14(2)(b) + (c) AND the safety report + the inventory of dangerous substances referred to in Article 14(2)(d) on demand, subject to the exceptions in Article 22(3): (a) confidentiality of the proceedings of the public authorities + international relations + national defence + public security; (b) confidentiality of personal data + files concerning a natural person who has not consented to disclosure (GDPR alignment); (c) commercial + industrial confidentiality including intellectual property; (d) confidentiality of the data + files of a third party where the third party has not consented to disclosure; (e) public security. Article 22(2) decisions to refuse access to information must be challengeable per Article 23 (re-stating the access-to-justice obligation). Article 23 access to justice in the broader sense including standing for NGOs + interest groups consistent with the Aarhus Convention. The public-access regime overlaps with Directive 2003/4/EC on access to environmental information.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.