Article 6(1) sets the recoverable damage categories: (a) death or personal injury, including medically recognised damage to PSYCHOLOGICAL health; (b) damage to or destruction of any property other than the defective product itself; (c) damage to or destruction of data, where the data is not used exclusively for professional purposes. Article 6(2): in cases of property damage where the property is used by the injured person both for personal AND non-professional purposes, the property damage is recoverable. Article 6(3): pure economic loss is not recoverable. The Article 6(1)(a) inclusion of psychological harm + Article 6(1)(c) data destruction / corruption is one of the most significant modernisations of the 2024 PLD over the 1985 Directive (which covered only death + personal injury + property damage other than the defective product itself in a B2C context, EUR 500 threshold removed). The Article 6(1)(c) data damage covers personal data loss + non-professional data destruction (e.g. family photos + personal documents stored on a defective device).
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.