Article 4(1)-(2) (applying from 8 November 2024) require Member States to respect the effective editorial freedom and independence of media service providers in the exercise of their professional activities. Article 4(3)-(4) prohibit Member States and any public authorities from: (a) obliging media service providers, their staff or their associates to disclose information identifying or making identifiable a source, or any related communications; (b) detaining, sanctioning, intercepting communications, or carrying out surveillance of media service providers or family members for the purpose of obtaining information; (c) deploying intrusive surveillance software (spyware) on devices used by media service providers, their staff or their associates, except where strictly necessary in a specific case by judicial authorisation for investigating a serious crime listed in Article 4(4)(c), and with proportionality + judicial review safeguards. Article 4(5)-(7) establish effective national-law judicial review, the right to be heard, and effective remedies.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.