Article 30 governs the technical aspects of switching: providers shall facilitate switching by ensuring that the customer can use exportable data, digital assets, applicable application protocols, equivalent functionalities and equivalent service-level performance with the destination provider. Article 31 sets a specific regime for certain custom-built data processing services where strict functional equivalence is technically infeasible, requiring instead structured cooperation between the source provider, destination provider and customer to design a tailored switching solution.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.