Article 26 empowers the Commission, after consulting the ESB and where strictly necessary in the crisis stage, to require IPFs/OEFs (and undertakings whose Member State has accepted) to accept and prioritise an order of crisis-relevant products on terms specified by the Commission. The undertaking must accept and prioritise the order unless prioritising would conflict with public-policy or security obligations or where there are exceptional grounds (Article 26(3)-(5)). Priority-rated orders override conflicting private contractual obligations to the extent set in Article 26(6).
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.