Article 4(6) provides that for claims against a defendant who used the AI system in the course of a personal, non-professional activity the 4(1) presumption applies only where the defendant materially interfered with the conditions of operation of the AI system or where the defendant was required and able to determine the conditions of operation but failed to do so.
The graph holds this control, the 0 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.