Protected persons shall not be considered to have breached restrictions on disclosure and shall not incur liability for reporting or public disclosure made in accordance with the Directive; in proceedings concerning detriment suffered, where the reporter shows they reported and suffered a detriment, it shall be presumed the detriment was retaliation and the burden shifts to the person who took the measure to prove it was based on duly justified grounds.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.