Where appropriate, a positive assurance opinion is given, together with improvement recommendations on the weaknesses found in operational performance, in external compliance and in internal control: the effect of each control weakness is recorded; management is kept up to date while the work is under way so it understands what is being done and preliminary findings and recommendations are agreed and accepted; the report follows the terms of reference, the scope and the reporting standards agreed, backs up the results and concentrates on the main issues and the actions that matter most; and the assurance work is supervised so that it is finished, achieves its objectives and reaches an acceptable standard, with the approach changed if the quality falls short.
This control maps to 2 controls across 2 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 2 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.